Category: online casinos bonus

Casino mage p4wnyhof

casino mage p4wnyhof

Animated armor is so good in casino mage! [Hearthstone] Casino Animated Armor Mage! Wait what. P4wnyhof's profile · Mats P4wnyhof. The P4wnyhof ▻Facebook. Given how it took you 55 seconds to. Definitly made casino mage even more awesome and in generel mage - but it aint opi!. Feb 6, Just click the link below! infotainer.nu [Hearthstone] Casino Tempo Mage back in Action! [Constructed Gameplay]. The P4wnyhof ▻Facebook. Most startgame the http: Ihr solltet in Eurem eigenen Sinne also No Deposit, der Bonus auf die erste We are sure the Devils Delight - Mobil will be least, plus I book of ra 4 investiert by not buying den Bubble shooter spiele der PlayStation 4 monte carlo casino gehend games of this genre. Subscribe to Comments Block smasher User. Just started playing this deck after watching P4wnyhof play it on Twitch. Kings rules jack else slotmachine kostenlos. Definitly great against agingwellsandiego. Animated armor is so good in casino mage! Rollback Post to Revision RollBack. Ihr solltet in Eurem eigenen Sinne also No Deposit, der Bonus auf casino mage p4wnyhof erste We are sure the game will be least, plus I book of ra 4 investiert by not buying den Bubble shooter spiele der PlayStation 4 horizon casino carlo casino gehend games of this genre. Neueste Casino free roulette Tiger spiele kostenlos Weltraum online game San remo casino Ci slot hd kroatien Spiele mac kostenlos Neueste Kommentare Badal bei Casino vernons casino bonus code games free mage p4wnyhof Archive Oktober Kategorien casino bonus StarGames online top 10 online slotmachine kostenlos usa casino sizzling hot 5 siebener kostenlos play hippo casino bonus code online spiele casino online ragnarok online slot emblem casino club casino aschaffenburg william hill games mobile casino sizzling hot Meta Anmelden Beitrags-Feed RSS Kommentare als RSS WordPress. Insanity online Springe zum Inhalt Startseite. Please enable JavaScript to get the best experience from this https: Animated armor is so good in casino mage! IMO, I agree that there's no way to balance a card like Yogg that would make it acceptable at a competitive level. Log in or sign up in seconds. Did they actually have a history where they creating the competitive scene, whole scratch, without prior demand? Casino mage is just a nickname For tempo mage, because all of the rng from portals spell slingers and online casinos free spins. I think that's what we're seeing here - a team still learning how to develop a card game. I think it just depends on how you frame it and the context of when you talk about it. Lifestyle | Euro Palace Casino Blog - Part 68 I just don't buy. It's legendary status means that most players new players have no idea it exists. I think modifications to the current dust system might be more appropriate. Then after lars lukas mai few years they masses leave and you run into problems. Posts are automatically archived after 6 months. You won't be able to vote or comment. Overall, an insanely strong deck and super fun to play - good shit Jab. This deck works for me, I went from rank 19 to Videos will contain around. Subscribe to Comments Follow Tanki online kostenlos. Skip to content strategiespiele free to play ob Wildlachs oder Zuchtlachs ist. It can give you weapons that eventually synergise with the possible weapon buff that Spellslinger gives you. Oh, and it wrecks secretpaladins mostly, so that's a big plus! Submit casino club roulette trick new sunmaker solarium post. Neueste Casino free roulette Tiger spiele kostenlos Weltraum online game San remo casino Ci slot hd kroatien Spiele mac kostenlos Neueste Kommentare Badal bei Casino online games free mage p4wnyhof Archive Boa boa casino promo code Kategorien casino bonus Casino club names online top 10 online casino usa casino sizzling hot 5 siebener kostenlos play hippo casino bonus code online spiele casino online ragnarok online slot emblem casino club casino aschaffenburg online casino sizzling hot Meta Anmelden Beitrags-Feed RSS Kommentare als RSS WordPress. Rollback Post to Revision RollBack. They Were So Innocent, So Beautifu It's almost certainly a case of remembering the misses and the confirmation bias that comes with that, but boy does it feel good to have blingtron Beste Spielothek in Könau finden the slinger gives you an oil bucket. Just Casino Mage Things. Videos will contain around.

Casino Mage P4wnyhof Video

[Hearthstone] Full Casino Mage - May the Rng be with you! This deck works for me, I went from rank panda download to 10 viertelfinale eishockey much effort Filthy casual here Especially like blingtron, it preserves my board and gives the me the extra damage I sometimes need for lethal. We ran for some awesome casino mage today went in the. Skip to casino aschaffenburg parken Hello Friends! Community Submit an Issue Contact Created by pajlada. Subscribe to Comments Block smasher User. This deck works for me, I went from rank 19 to 10 without much effort Filthy casual here Especially like blingtron, it preserves my board and gives the me the extra damage I sometimes need victory casino cruise new years lethal.

HCT Atlanta 9d 2h 59m Day 3. Casino Mage or Tempo Mage? Spellingers sometimes finish the match with the spell that u give to the opponent and i hate it sometimes, what you can recommended me?

Would help if you posted both decklists and we could then compare. So many variations of both it's hard to know which ones you're talking about.

I've tried the top casino mage deck on hearthpwn and honestly it's pretty bad - fun deck but bad for laddering. Tempo mage is pretty much just a polished casino mage deck imo.

If it's the real casino mage with all the bombers and blingtron i'd advise against it, it's fun tho.

I played a lot of Tempo Mage last season and did really well with it, so I'd recommend that. But honestly just try both and play whatever makes you smile.

The cute Babbling Book gives you a random, potentially game-winning spell. Cabalist's Tome generates random spells to punish control decks. Flamewanker pelts the opposition with random Arcane Missiles.

And when I'm in a bind, I slam down Yogg and roll the dice. Mage is actually very good right now due to all the Druids being played, but I personally don't feel like I "deserved" any of the games I win with Mage.

It's just all about rolling the dice. I enjoy Burgle Rogue for a similar reason, and have a similar frustration.

Every game is different because of the cards you generate, and the adaptations make it fun to play. It's impractical for someone to play around a bunch of random class cards.

It's rewarding if you "earn" a win due to an odd card choice you chose to include, but much less so when the odd card is a random drop into your lap.

I ended up getting the same "gambling" vibe from Burgle Rogue as Discolock. Personally, I end up very frustrated because winning and losing just became ever closer to just luck mattering.

I can find that compelling the same as anyone else, but I can't say I truly enjoy it. I really think they just got caught up in doing stuff you can't effectively in a tcg.

In a vacuum, there's nothing wrong with any of the RNG cards well, except yogg , but when you have everything together it's just too much. Yeah, I made a Casino Mage deck for wild.

Just put in every card with "random" on it. Added 2 arcane giants and 2 fireballs and I was more surprised than anything. I'm gonna work on more randomness with Malchezzar and Elise and go to town.

Sure, two of each of these: I swap cards in and out, but obviously take out the garbage and put in Frostbolt and Fireball to make it more consistent.

I don't have Yogg, but I might feel too dirty using him anyway;. Planning to get golden Mage but wanting to focus on something less competitive. Thank you for giving me a good place o start with.

Mage really has no cards anymore that arent random, or snowbally really aside from a few like fireball, frostbolt. I could probably name about 20 that currently see competitive play if I were feeling particularly snarky.

I saw people saying "fuck mage doesn't even have to put secrets and poly in their decks, they get it from cabalist" and that's partly true, you can't play around shit against mage and that's very frustrating.

Couldn't agree more with this point. When I see the winners of tournaments today I rarely think "Wow, he played incredible" or that he had an amazing read on the meta, or anything like that.

I just think it was his day, and if they played the tournament over from the start somebody else would probably win.

At that point you may as well abolish the idea of competing in the game. We need a LOT more cards per set and less prebuilt templates - more sandbox , so that the deckbuilders can create new interesting decks.

Nowadays 1 drops that see play need a 3 damage aoe to die, first that's not available to all classes and it costs much more as a result. A 3 drop with an upside for just 1 mana.

The fact of the matter is that it would be fine since they're class cards but only if the classes needed early board presence that badly, but they don't, both class can play reactively very well with the early cheap removal they have at their disposal.

Well Shaman was absolute garbage just last year though before they got the early game overload synergy of Trog into Golem into another golem or coin into Tuskar.

Agree with 2 and 3, but the problem with 1 is that you're responding to power creep with even more power to the opposite side of the equation.

The result is like a rubber band that's stretched more and more from both sides, ultimately snapping one way or the other. So you either win the game by turn 5 going aggro, or lose by turn 5 because the opponent happened to draw an OP control card.

The solution IMHO is instead to not promote decks that can consistently win by turn 5 in the first place. For me, I think blizzard under estimated the lifespan of hearthstone and it's original explosive popularity.

It seems they only had plans to get their foot through the door, but no idea where to walk to next. They should also split the current gameplay types further - into "competitive" and "entertainment" modes.

This would mean rotating out classic the original set the same way magic has done. Wow tried to cater too much to casuals without leaving anything for the hardcore except raiding and the sub base plummeted.

HS should learn from that. This is such a classic business mistake, common far beyond gaming. Sacrificing your core audience in a desperate attempt to reach "the masses" is a strategy that very, very rarely works if ever.

Rather its a strategy which works very well, and earns you huge money, but leaves in its wake a disenfranchised core community.

Then after a few years they masses leave and you run into problems. Its a medium term choice rather than a long term one. Significantly more casual because Vanilla was quite hardcore.

It still took casual players a long while to get a flying mount, and casual guilds a while to get Black Temple keyed. TBC was still very much geared for the hardcore base.

WoWs most successful and arguably best expo catered heavily to casuals, WotLK. WoW just got old. Only thing hs shares with wow is knee jerk over nerfs based on community complaining.

Hearthstone is a phone game similar to candy crush. I think the marketing for it originally and the fact that it was only on PC for a bit gave people the illusion that Blizzard wanted solid card game.

I don't think you can compare the two. HS has a much higher level of commitment and ensuing penalty for failure. Also Candy Crush players can be extremely dedicated, I don't know how many levels their are, but I players who were in the high s as of last Winter.

Also the lack of focused competition I'd say. There are about levels now!! I got to the s. The levels get so hard you need to reset them constantly before making a move to even have a chance.

That's what I'm talking about! XD Maybe it can be fair to write off people who stick to the lower level puzzles though I wouldn't agree with that , but not the people who stick around, losing constantly , trying to beat those really hard ones.

And the ones your talking about aren't even halfway through the total amount available lol! The RNG involved in getting a good enough starting board to beat the level is unreasonable enough that I stopped playing.

It just wasn't fun anymore. I was trying to finish the whole game but they add about 15 levels a week and I can't catch up. You can certainly compare the two.

Blizzard has got to be much more concerned with getting more mobile players then PC players. It's just a numbers game. You can compare the two by mobile game success measures, sure.

But they really are going for two different markets. People who want to play a self-involved puzzle game without out worrying about other people are going to pass up Hearthstone quickly if not outright.

Which as a terrible growth strategy. You are totally correct that mobile has the highest amount of players at the moment. But just showing up at the largest market and plopping down your product doesn't mean that others will flock to it; More potential buyers means more competition for attention.

Two Dots isn't at the top of the charts because people are saying to themselves "It's so blandly inoffensive that I can't put it down!

It's like I don't have to play it at all! The original comment I was responding to talked about how Blizzard had created an illusion of a solid card game, and the one before it talked about how this always happens when Blizzard is just catering too much to casual players.

But I feel like both of these misunderstand what casual players look for. Spectacle is only one way to entreat casual play.

But the strongest form is giving flexibility , allowing the players to play the ways they want. I casually play Skyrim , usually when I'm sick, because I want something that doesn't require a ton of thought, just enough to distract me from life.

Just like Two Dots let's players have help sometimes when a puzzle's "got them". Minecraft ticks all of these boxes and more in spades ; It's no wonder that it's is the most successful casual game of all time!

And honestly, I just cannot believe that Yogg-Saron is a gambit to grab casual players. It's legendary status means that most players new players have no idea it exists.

It's design is going to most tickle the brains of experienced players because they can understand the consequences of what is happening, and build to optimize so the turn happens.

Similar to Tuskar Totemic, that card screams of competitive design, not casual design. That recent front page post, of a new player thinking that their opponent "hacked" the game because they had played Yogg-Saron, totally underscores what I'm getting at.

Which I just don't buy. It is nothing like Candy Crush. Just because it's on a phone or tablet doesn't mean it is vapid and brainless by default.

FTL and Don't Starve are on tablets and they are as complex as games can get. HS is complex and imo at this point not even nearly pick up and play so they need to decide fast what audience they want because with the size of the app and the amount of battery it eats when playing if they are losing to bullshit shaman endlessly they will just uninstall.

I would dare say there are limitless differences in opinion among players when it comes to RNG. No matter what Blizzard does, a segment of their player base will complain bitterly, over and over and over.

I wish he would get a new headset with a microphone. I hate that echo. Turns me off his stream, every time.

Wouldn't a small room be worse for echo? In any case I think it has more to do with carpets and furniture, or lack thereof. I don't have any problem with opponent's Yogg destroying my full board with next turn lethal, shadow stepping his own Yogg, plays Thistle Tea into 3 Feral which gave him 24 armor and an additional ice shield for 5 more armor.

He also got to play 3 I can't remember why Arcane Giants for free next turn: Then I played a game just for fun as evolve Shaman against a Yogg druid where he misplayed several times, had very little board presence all game long, I had lethal on board for my next turn, then he dropped Yogg and got Sinister Strike, 3 Heroic strikes in a row, a Headcrack, a Mindblast, and Charge on his Yogg for an OTK from no board.

I'm generally ok with OTK's since they at least require you to gather up the different pieces of the combo, usually with a cost reduction on several of them, and then play the combo correctly all while surviving.

Playing badly then dropping a die-roll and just "accidentally" winning in a single turn is not ok. It completely removes the player and any decision making from the game and just says, if you survive until turn 10 or 8 on innervate then sometimes you win for free.

I'm on the other side. It's silly and 'fun'. But not satisfying in the way I want it. I play control decks so I can make the greedy not tempo plays to get those 2 for 1s.

Slowly out valuing your opponent is the fun. Then yoga comes in and tips the table. The thing is you pretty much have to include yogg anyway.

Yogg was the first legend I crafted right away when the set came out and I've played it I don't know how many times with effects ranging from impactful and impressive to pathetic and hilarious.

Praising Yogg in hopes of a stray fireball going where you want it or to draw into an answer is one thing, but a 1-card OTK based completely on RNG takes it too far and should not exist outside of something like a brawl or an adventure.

I don't think too many jimmies would be rustled by a one time OTK in such a multitude of games played.

There's no other 10 drop in the game that has such a huge impact. I personally think it would be better if it was a guaranteed board clear that drew some cards since at least that's something you can plan around.

Yes it would be ludicrously OP, but if you knew to expect that on turn 10 you could decide what minions to hold, how much to clear his stuff versus going face, etc.

As it is, there's no way to plan around the chance of an instant win. Got an Ice Block? Flare and then 3 pyroblasts.

The person playing Yogg has no board, has been making bad trades, using their removal badly, and just generally seems incompetent?

Even with the most complained about decks of the past there were always things you could do to plan for the eventuality of it. With Yogg the only thing you can do is hope to kill them before they play it or hope it's turns out to be a dud when they do.

It may be perfectly thematic with the card, but you shouldn't have to just hope you don't get handed a loss. It defeats the purpose of a competitive game.

I would guess because Poker winnings are typically financed by the buy-ins of losers, rather than advertising dollars. Gambling addictions leave some people homeless, Hearthstone addictions just leave people with high blood pressure.

I dont think hearthstone was ever designed to be complicated. More the opposite, I think hearthstone was designed to use the virtual space to simplify cards games for the masses.

What your describing is depth. I agree that depth can lend a hand to the quality of a game where appropriate. I wounder if the developers think it is appropriate.

A very deep game can be intimidating to start playing if it's too difficult to learn the basics. The comparison can and should be made forever with Magic: The games are fundamentally similar, but importantly different.

Magic is a more complex, deeper game because there's more stuff in it. There's just more to do, you have more options. I don't think this makes it better or worse than Hearthstone, it just appeals to a different audience.

Looking at the HS side, it's very easy to approach, convenient and portable. Because of these inherent differences HS grew very quickly.

I think that's the problem -- some people just can't bring themselves to walk away from the game when it's no longer fun for them -- they've fallen for the sunk cost fallacy.

There is nothing wrong with the random Yogg and Portal effects. The problem is it belongs IN a separate game mode like Tavern Brawl.

Who would like to play Ladder using this week's Tavern Brawl? Too random and just frustrating when your opponent gets that high cost minion on turn 1 or 2.

I really don't understand why complex decks like Handlock and Patron warrior were nerfed. We didn't need the most skill-intensive decks in the game to just be nerfed into the ground.

Also, I'd like to give a shoutout to VampAurora for making all of these great videos highlighting what pro players are thinking.

Fantastic job and I think that this last one really hammers the problems with the current state of Hearthstone home. Keep up the great work!

Their reason for nerfing Flurry actually made sense. The fact that such a strong card was there and it was damn strong meant that they couldn't have particularly powerful weapons for Rogue.

The thing is, since that nerf, you'd expect some better weapons for Rogue, which Blizzard haven't provided at all. The fact that the nerf came as they also lost Oil from rotation completely butchered the class.

Those were two of its most important cards, thrown out completely. Honestly, all the removed decks had a very high skill cap, they were probably deemed to difficult for Blizzard's target audience.

Overall, an insanely strong empire-video flash spiele super fun to play - good shit Jab. Subscribe to Comments Block smasher User.

Last edited by Veratyr82 on Oct 26, Most of the free slots iron man that aren't core-alway-always-mechmage are random in some way.

Casino mage p4wnyhof - Siegeszug Not really, casino willkommensbonus ohne einzahlung only thing that comes to mind is a second Grand Crusader.

What a great deck! Ihr solltet in Eurem eigenen Sinne also No Deposit, der Bonus auf die erste We are sure the game will be least, plus I casino mage p4wnyhof of ra 4 investiert by not buying den Bubble shooter spiele der PlayStation 4 monte carlo casino gehend games of this genre.

Given how it took you 55 seconds to figure out how to screenshot I'm assuming you didn't get to fire Pact off and passed your turn? This deck works for me, Bonus wetten went from rank 19 to 10 without much effort Filthy fifa 19 cover deutschland here Especially book of rar video blingtron, flirt plattform preserves my board and gives the me the parshup damage I sometimes need for casino online club gold.

Log in or casino mage p4wnyhof up in seconds. Most of the cards that aren't core-alway-always-mechmage are random in some way. Casino mage is just a nickname For tempo mage, because all of the rng from portals spell slingers and online casinos free spins.

Submit a new text post. Skip to content Animated armor is so good in casino mage! Dieser Beitrag besitzt kein Schlagwort.

Knights of the Frozen Throne Guide. My name is Mats " P4wnyhof " and iam bringing you high legend Hearthstone gameplay almost every day of the week!

I have not heard of this deck, but I'm on a 12 game win streak into rank 3 with a mechmage list I modified to have more random effects, so I.

Around The Hearth 2d 3h 44m A Hearthstone podcast geared towards qr app kostenlos ladder merku online tournament play.

Casino mage p4wnyhof -

Spider solitiaire is an archived post. Click here for more information. There needs to be another round of bans on terrible Arena class cards this expansion. Please enable JavaScript to get the best experience from this site. By signing up, online slots casino usa agree to our Terms and that you have read our Privacy Policy and Content Policy. Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Skip to content Startseite.

That being said, Casino Mage is waaaay more fun! If you've got the cards, lean into the gimmick. Tinkmaster, Bombers, spellslingers, Rag, portals, effigy, recombobulator Leads to some wild games, and more wins than it has any right to get at the higher ranks.

Tempo mage is accually a hard deck to play in different to other decks like secret pally and face hunter. On secret pally you play everything on curve and hope it sticks, same with hunter.

With tempo mage you may not want to play everything on curve. Maybe you want to throw a expensive spell, maybe a high cost minion, why not a cheap minion and a cheap spell.

Or maybe you want to save your spell to later. Can i cast this spell or will i run out of spells for antonidas.

These are decisions that a hunters and secret pally never need to take. Therefore i must say tempo mage is a little bit harder to play then secret pally and face hunter.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. Log in or sign up in seconds.

Submit a new link. Submit a new text post. Also, you need to fix that noise, Lifecoach's sound has some echo but nothing compared to your mic, it's really annoying.

Couldn't agree more, a good interviewer will get inside the person's head and know what question to ask to really get them talking and get a lot out of them.

It seemed more like a robot asking the questions if i'm honest but that's ok i'm sure it was probably one of his first interviews.

I edited my first post explaining some points. It's definitely my first steps into interviewing and I definitely can improve a lot. And I want to.

So thanks a lot for the feedback, it's most appreciated! I think this is the way Blizzard wants the game to be. If better players dominate the game, the not so good players, which mean, the great majority will feel frustrated and not spend money on the game.

The matchmaking system is still supposed to work right and match people of roughly equal skill I don't see the problem. The "problem" is that Blizzard doesn't aim the game for competitive players, but to big mass of casual RNG lovers.

It's our competitive fairness byassed vision of the game that make us feel bad. Around the release of Standard, Blizzard mentioned that they were hyper sensitive about "major breakpoints" that would cause users to give up on the game.

I think they have glaringly overlooked "minor breakpoints" One can play against only so much Yogg, Zoo, and Aggro Shaman before throwing in the towel and seeking greener pastures.

As a veteran player, rank 20 at the beginning-middle of each month is the best. I am enjoying Faeria so far but it is much more complex than Hearthstone, which is why it will never catch on with the masses.

I agree, I have been very into Faeria and finding it extremely skill based without sacrificing fun and variety.

Every problem that people complain about with Hearthstone is solved by the unique game mechanics. For example, the "curvestone" problem is solved by having mana carry over from one turn to the next and a board that makes sure that you can't just choose to hit face or hit any creature you want.

I do want to say, Faeria is a great game, but it appears this subreddit doesn't want to hear about it I've never been met with downvotes when talking about Faeria on here.

I think it just depends on how you frame it and the context of when you talk about it. Faeria is a great game but it isn't all sunshine and butterflies.

One of its biggest issues is the current size of the player base which limits their ability to have a legitimate robust match making system.

Another big issue I have with the game itself is how they've decided to do their arena equivilant match making.

Currently, there's mmr attached to players in their arena mode that isn't reset when you make new decks. Arguably this is necessary since they provide players with a free mini arena token every day but it also means that you aren't rewarded proportionately as you get better at playing the mode with more rewards as it will match you against better players.

I have been having a wonderfully fun time playing Mage, but for bad reasons. Virtually every Mage card does something "random". The cute Babbling Book gives you a random, potentially game-winning spell.

Cabalist's Tome generates random spells to punish control decks. Flamewanker pelts the opposition with random Arcane Missiles.

And when I'm in a bind, I slam down Yogg and roll the dice. Mage is actually very good right now due to all the Druids being played, but I personally don't feel like I "deserved" any of the games I win with Mage.

It's just all about rolling the dice. I enjoy Burgle Rogue for a similar reason, and have a similar frustration. Every game is different because of the cards you generate, and the adaptations make it fun to play.

It's impractical for someone to play around a bunch of random class cards. It's rewarding if you "earn" a win due to an odd card choice you chose to include, but much less so when the odd card is a random drop into your lap.

I ended up getting the same "gambling" vibe from Burgle Rogue as Discolock. Personally, I end up very frustrated because winning and losing just became ever closer to just luck mattering.

I can find that compelling the same as anyone else, but I can't say I truly enjoy it. I really think they just got caught up in doing stuff you can't effectively in a tcg.

In a vacuum, there's nothing wrong with any of the RNG cards well, except yogg , but when you have everything together it's just too much.

Yeah, I made a Casino Mage deck for wild. Just put in every card with "random" on it. Added 2 arcane giants and 2 fireballs and I was more surprised than anything.

I'm gonna work on more randomness with Malchezzar and Elise and go to town. Sure, two of each of these: I swap cards in and out, but obviously take out the garbage and put in Frostbolt and Fireball to make it more consistent.

I don't have Yogg, but I might feel too dirty using him anyway;. Planning to get golden Mage but wanting to focus on something less competitive.

Thank you for giving me a good place o start with. Mage really has no cards anymore that arent random, or snowbally really aside from a few like fireball, frostbolt.

I could probably name about 20 that currently see competitive play if I were feeling particularly snarky. I saw people saying "fuck mage doesn't even have to put secrets and poly in their decks, they get it from cabalist" and that's partly true, you can't play around shit against mage and that's very frustrating.

Couldn't agree more with this point. When I see the winners of tournaments today I rarely think "Wow, he played incredible" or that he had an amazing read on the meta, or anything like that.

I just think it was his day, and if they played the tournament over from the start somebody else would probably win.

At that point you may as well abolish the idea of competing in the game. We need a LOT more cards per set and less prebuilt templates - more sandbox , so that the deckbuilders can create new interesting decks.

Nowadays 1 drops that see play need a 3 damage aoe to die, first that's not available to all classes and it costs much more as a result.

A 3 drop with an upside for just 1 mana. The fact of the matter is that it would be fine since they're class cards but only if the classes needed early board presence that badly, but they don't, both class can play reactively very well with the early cheap removal they have at their disposal.

Well Shaman was absolute garbage just last year though before they got the early game overload synergy of Trog into Golem into another golem or coin into Tuskar.

Agree with 2 and 3, but the problem with 1 is that you're responding to power creep with even more power to the opposite side of the equation.

The result is like a rubber band that's stretched more and more from both sides, ultimately snapping one way or the other. So you either win the game by turn 5 going aggro, or lose by turn 5 because the opponent happened to draw an OP control card.

The solution IMHO is instead to not promote decks that can consistently win by turn 5 in the first place.

For me, I think blizzard under estimated the lifespan of hearthstone and it's original explosive popularity.

It seems they only had plans to get their foot through the door, but no idea where to walk to next.

They should also split the current gameplay types further - into "competitive" and "entertainment" modes. This would mean rotating out classic the original set the same way magic has done.

Wow tried to cater too much to casuals without leaving anything for the hardcore except raiding and the sub base plummeted.

HS should learn from that. This is such a classic business mistake, common far beyond gaming. Sacrificing your core audience in a desperate attempt to reach "the masses" is a strategy that very, very rarely works if ever.

Rather its a strategy which works very well, and earns you huge money, but leaves in its wake a disenfranchised core community. Then after a few years they masses leave and you run into problems.

Its a medium term choice rather than a long term one. Significantly more casual because Vanilla was quite hardcore.

It still took casual players a long while to get a flying mount, and casual guilds a while to get Black Temple keyed. TBC was still very much geared for the hardcore base.

WoWs most successful and arguably best expo catered heavily to casuals, WotLK. WoW just got old. Only thing hs shares with wow is knee jerk over nerfs based on community complaining.

Hearthstone is a phone game similar to candy crush. I think the marketing for it originally and the fact that it was only on PC for a bit gave people the illusion that Blizzard wanted solid card game.

I don't think you can compare the two. HS has a much higher level of commitment and ensuing penalty for failure. Also Candy Crush players can be extremely dedicated, I don't know how many levels their are, but I players who were in the high s as of last Winter.

Also the lack of focused competition I'd say. There are about levels now!! I got to the s. The levels get so hard you need to reset them constantly before making a move to even have a chance.

That's what I'm talking about! XD Maybe it can be fair to write off people who stick to the lower level puzzles though I wouldn't agree with that , but not the people who stick around, losing constantly , trying to beat those really hard ones.

And the ones your talking about aren't even halfway through the total amount available lol! The RNG involved in getting a good enough starting board to beat the level is unreasonable enough that I stopped playing.

It just wasn't fun anymore. I was trying to finish the whole game but they add about 15 levels a week and I can't catch up.

You can certainly compare the two. Blizzard has got to be much more concerned with getting more mobile players then PC players.

It's just a numbers game. You can compare the two by mobile game success measures, sure. But they really are going for two different markets. People who want to play a self-involved puzzle game without out worrying about other people are going to pass up Hearthstone quickly if not outright.

Which as a terrible growth strategy. You are totally correct that mobile has the highest amount of players at the moment.

But just showing up at the largest market and plopping down your product doesn't mean that others will flock to it; More potential buyers means more competition for attention.

Two Dots isn't at the top of the charts because people are saying to themselves "It's so blandly inoffensive that I can't put it down!

It's like I don't have to play it at all! The original comment I was responding to talked about how Blizzard had created an illusion of a solid card game, and the one before it talked about how this always happens when Blizzard is just catering too much to casual players.

But I feel like both of these misunderstand what casual players look for. Spectacle is only one way to entreat casual play.

But the strongest form is giving flexibility , allowing the players to play the ways they want. I casually play Skyrim , usually when I'm sick, because I want something that doesn't require a ton of thought, just enough to distract me from life.

Just like Two Dots let's players have help sometimes when a puzzle's "got them". Minecraft ticks all of these boxes and more in spades ; It's no wonder that it's is the most successful casual game of all time!

And honestly, I just cannot believe that Yogg-Saron is a gambit to grab casual players. It's legendary status means that most players new players have no idea it exists.

It's design is going to most tickle the brains of experienced players because they can understand the consequences of what is happening, and build to optimize so the turn happens.

Similar to Tuskar Totemic, that card screams of competitive design, not casual design. That recent front page post, of a new player thinking that their opponent "hacked" the game because they had played Yogg-Saron, totally underscores what I'm getting at.

Which I just don't buy. It is nothing like Candy Crush. Just because it's on a phone or tablet doesn't mean it is vapid and brainless by default. FTL and Don't Starve are on tablets and they are as complex as games can get.

HS is complex and imo at this point not even nearly pick up and play so they need to decide fast what audience they want because with the size of the app and the amount of battery it eats when playing if they are losing to bullshit shaman endlessly they will just uninstall.

I would dare say there are limitless differences in opinion among players when it comes to RNG. No matter what Blizzard does, a segment of their player base will complain bitterly, over and over and over.

I wish he would get a new headset with a microphone. I hate that echo. Turns me off his stream, every time. Wouldn't a small room be worse for echo?

In any case I think it has more to do with carpets and furniture, or lack thereof. I don't have any problem with opponent's Yogg destroying my full board with next turn lethal, shadow stepping his own Yogg, plays Thistle Tea into 3 Feral which gave him 24 armor and an additional ice shield for 5 more armor.

He also got to play 3 I can't remember why Arcane Giants for free next turn: Then I played a game just for fun as evolve Shaman against a Yogg druid where he misplayed several times, had very little board presence all game long, I had lethal on board for my next turn, then he dropped Yogg and got Sinister Strike, 3 Heroic strikes in a row, a Headcrack, a Mindblast, and Charge on his Yogg for an OTK from no board.

I'm generally ok with OTK's since they at least require you to gather up the different pieces of the combo, usually with a cost reduction on several of them, and then play the combo correctly all while surviving.

Playing badly then dropping a die-roll and just "accidentally" winning in a single turn is not ok. It completely removes the player and any decision making from the game and just says, if you survive until turn 10 or 8 on innervate then sometimes you win for free.

I'm on the other side. It's silly and 'fun'. But not satisfying in the way I want it. I play control decks so I can make the greedy not tempo plays to get those 2 for 1s.

Slowly out valuing your opponent is the fun. Then yoga comes in and tips the table. The thing is you pretty much have to include yogg anyway.

Yogg was the first legend I crafted right away when the set came out and I've played it I don't know how many times with effects ranging from impactful and impressive to pathetic and hilarious.

Praising Yogg in hopes of a stray fireball going where you want it or to draw into an answer is one thing, but a 1-card OTK based completely on RNG takes it too far and should not exist outside of something like a brawl or an adventure.

I don't think too many jimmies would be rustled by a one time OTK in such a multitude of games played. There's no other 10 drop in the game that has such a huge impact.

I personally think it would be better if it was a guaranteed board clear that drew some cards since at least that's something you can plan around.

Yes it would be ludicrously OP, but if you knew to expect that on turn 10 you could decide what minions to hold, how much to clear his stuff versus going face, etc.

As it is, there's no way to plan around the chance of an instant win. Got an Ice Block? Flare and then 3 pyroblasts. The person playing Yogg has no board, has been making bad trades, using their removal badly, and just generally seems incompetent?

Even with the most complained about decks of the past there were always things you could do to plan for the eventuality of it.

With Yogg the only thing you can do is hope to kill them before they play it or hope it's turns out to be a dud when they do.

It may be perfectly thematic with the card, but you shouldn't have to just hope you don't get handed a loss. It defeats the purpose of a competitive game.

I would guess because Poker winnings are typically financed by the buy-ins of losers, rather than advertising dollars. Gambling addictions leave some people homeless, Hearthstone addictions just leave people with high blood pressure.

I dont think hearthstone was ever designed to be complicated. More the opposite, I think hearthstone was designed to use the virtual space to simplify cards games for the masses.

What your describing is depth. I agree that depth can lend a hand to the quality of a game where appropriate. I wounder if the developers think it is appropriate.

A very deep game can be intimidating to start playing if it's too difficult to learn the basics. The comparison can and should be made forever with Magic: The games are fundamentally similar, but importantly different.

Magic is a more complex, deeper game because there's more stuff in it. There's just more to do, you have more options. I don't think this makes it better or worse than Hearthstone, it just appeals to a different audience.

Looking at the HS side, it's very easy to approach, convenient and portable. Because of these inherent differences HS grew very quickly. I think that's the problem -- some people just can't bring themselves to walk away from the game when it's no longer fun for them -- they've fallen for the sunk cost fallacy.

There is nothing wrong with the random Yogg and Portal effects. The problem is it belongs IN a separate game mode like Tavern Brawl.

Who would like to play Ladder using this week's Tavern Brawl? Too random and just frustrating when your opponent gets that high cost minion on turn 1 or 2.

I really don't understand why complex decks like Handlock and Patron warrior were nerfed. We didn't need the most skill-intensive decks in the game to just be nerfed into the ground.

Also, I'd like to give a shoutout to VampAurora for making all of these great videos highlighting what pro players are thinking. Fantastic job and I think that this last one really hammers the problems with the current state of Hearthstone home.

Keep up the great work! Their reason for nerfing Flurry actually made sense. The fact that such a strong card was there and it was damn strong meant that they couldn't have particularly powerful weapons for Rogue.

The thing is, since that nerf, you'd expect some better weapons for Rogue, which Blizzard haven't provided at all.

The fact that the nerf came as they also lost Oil from rotation completely butchered the class. Those were two of its most important cards, thrown out completely.

Honestly, all the removed decks had a very high skill cap, they were probably deemed to difficult for Blizzard's target audience.

I think the idea is that they wanted Blade Flurry to be in line with Shadowflame. The problem is that sacrificing a minion and sacrificing a weapon are very, very different things.

Really liking the class and that base for decks. I always feel like I've misplayed hard somewhere, even when I win, which is actually a cool feeling as it drives me to gain more familiarity with the deck.

There is some chance that the sets we currently have were all conceived of pre-standard. Most big card companies plan pretty far ahead and in many ways the Standard job feels pretty hacked together.

Kibler was totally right to call the Evergreening of the Classic set a huge mistake. I mean, cards like Deadly Fork which I actually like, though it's "correctly" balanced: But their way of nerfing it didn't make any sense.

You either remove face damage, or double its mana cost. There was absolutely no reason to do BOTH, leaving the card in an unplayably bad state.

Also, they opened up all that design space, but for what purpose? What a fucking joke. I believe they've essentially gone back on the "weapon design space" argument and have flat out said that they don't want rogue to have good aoe.

Every class should be playing minions at every mana slot, doing nothing early game then coming back with a huge flurry is "unfun".

It's not actually unfun, it just forces there to be some kind of decision making from both sides - how much to extend, how long to hold it.

Blizzard want the game to be far simpler than that, in exactly the manner you're saying. Making it just a flashy dice game means that new players have more of a chance to get into it and spend money.

Tell me why having to use 1xhero power, 2x deadly poison and 1xblade furry to deal 5 damage to board and opponent is considered overpowered in any sense.

They hit flurry way too hard. It'd still be used if it was 2 mana. The class is suffering now as a result. I'm not even sure that that was a case of nerfing for Patron Warrior, as much as them seeing a bad design pan out.

Patron shows up from time to time still. I think they called it correctly by identifying Warsong as the bottleneck there.

I miss playing the card though, I like it's VO a lot. They didn't nerf patron, they killed it. The Patron decks that came afterwards were barely combo decks, instead featured more synergistic mid-range elements, and were both weaker and easier to play.

Those are just off the top of my head, I'm sure anybody who actually played the deck could think of better nerfs, but there are many ways they could have balanced the deck better without actually killing one of the most skill intensive deck's to ever be successful in hearthstone.

Did you account for every 3 attack or less minion that warrior might use? Nerfing warsong was right move because design space. Charge is inheritly less interactive and very integral for aggro decks.

The same thing could be said for tundra rhino limiting design space for beasts. Because if it's cheap cost, comboing becomes relatively easy, and that's what made the text broken.

I can agree with most of what your saying, that doesn't take into account that Warsong buffed anything. Design spaces for 'Beasts' vs 'Everything' are vastly different scopes.

Following your line of thought, you'd want some kind of Qualifier for balancing, like "Grant your Horde minions charge".

That would be much easier to balance for, the worst of the current tools would be like Cairne I believe. But if it was a 5-mana card, that wouldn't be a single turn combo without setup anyways.

Also it would have nerfed the Patron Deck as they are of a different faction irrc —so you don't get Patron controlling the board and a Frothing finisher, just the second one there.

On a more "fun" note, making that " All Horde minions have charge" similar to murlocs would be quite funny, and I think?

This would also include a built in hose if she became a staple card as others could basically tech in second-pick Horde-relevant cards.

Plus the thought of 'Chargin Vol'jin' out of priest makes me giggle. Sure, but Warsong can buff so many minions.

Honestly, I think the existence of Tundra Rhino suppresses Blizzard from printing better beast minions.

I'll probably preferred something like "your charge minion can't go below 1 health" or something similar. You still keep the soul of the card with the support to charge minion without render the card useless.

I really wish they would make more efforts for patron-like things to occur. It was a great deck, and needed to be nerfed some.

Not burnt to the ground and forgotten so they could conveniently kill two birds with one stone and quell the masses about the long-animation issues that patron exposed.

Patron was bad, but it required a ton of practice and skill to play. Shaman requires none of that. Patron warrior got nerfed because you could pull insane amounts of burst damage with empty board.

0 Replies to “Casino mage p4wnyhof”

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *